Long-Form Analysis & Published Features
Published in the field. Read in the room.
Joseph R. Auriemma, Jr. writes for the practitioners who do the work, in the publications they actually read. Featured articles have appeared in Police1, the IADLEST Standards & Training Director Magazine, the ILEETA Journal, and Law Enforcement Today, with reach across tens of thousands of investigators, trainers, and command staff in North America. Long-form analysis pieces published on the ASC site cover investigative interviewing, Title IX practice, trauma-informed methodology, workplace investigations, and search warrant doctrine. The whole body of work is built on 24 years of New York State Police investigative experience, the methodology behind every ASC course, and the evidence-based interviewing research that the FBI HIG, the UN Méndez Principles, and the academic literature (Fisher and Geiselman; Granhag and Hartwig) identify as the discipline that produces accurate, complete, and defensible disclosure.
Not opinion writing. Doctrine, in print.
13 articles published·4 industry outlets·Tens of thousands of practitioners reached
Featured In
Editorial features in the publications law-enforcement, training, and investigative professionals read.
What POST standards should require from an interview training course
There is no consistent national floor for what a law enforcement interview training course must contain. This model lays out the eight elements a modern course should require, from evidence-based, non-coercive methodology and the Cognitive Interview to Strategic Use of Evidence, trauma-informed practice, procedural justice, and qualified instructors, and argues that an integrated framework matters more than a checklist of content areas.
Read the Article ↗“Standards are how a profession says, in writing, what it expects of itself.”
Why cases fail: the doctrine files.
Every failed case fails for a reason, and the reason is almost always documented. These long-form analyses trace the specific investigative errors that get warrants voided, findings reversed, and interviews lost, grouped by the failure each one is built to prevent.
Why Statements Get Suppressed: Five Patterns From the Case Law
The recurring reasons custodial statements and confessions get thrown out, each traced to the controlling cases in the Suppression Database: Miranda defects, invocation violations, two-step interrogation, voluntariness, and juvenile-specific rules.
Interviewing Juveniles After the Deception Bans: What the Law Requires
Ten states now restrict deceptive interrogation of minors, and the research explains why. Grounded in J.D.B. v. North Carolina, the state deception-ban statutes, and the false-confession record: why juveniles confess falsely, what the law now requires, and how to interview a young person so the account holds.
Location Data After Chatrie: Writing Geofence and Location Warrants That Survive
The Supreme Court's June 2026 decision in Chatrie v. United States settled that a geofence request for stored location history is a Fourth Amendment search, and left the reasonableness question open. What changed, how it follows the line from Carpenter, and how to write geofence, reverse-keyword, and location warrants that survive.
The Affiant Biography: The Most Underused Section of a Search Warrant
The affidavit section that tells the court who is swearing to the facts and why they are qualified to interpret them. What a defensible biography must establish, the overstatement errors that invite a Franks or Alfinito challenge, and why you write it last. Includes a free fillable worksheet.
Search Warrants That Survive Challenge: Patterns from 1,500+ Filings
Drawn from 1,500-plus search warrants and court orders authored over a 24-year investigative career: affidavit structure, common suppression vulnerabilities, digital-evidence considerations after Carpenter, and the foundational case law (Katz, Gates, Franks, Kentucky v. King) that shapes every paragraph.
When Material Omissions Sink a Warrant: Lessons from the Trinidad, Texas Case
A teaching case study on the duty to disclose material facts in a search warrant affidavit. Drawn from the unfolding Trinidad, Texas case and the Franks doctrine: how omissions become a suppression problem, why affiant credibility is cumulative and now documented, and what the Backward Read is built to catch.
Published features
Joe’s writing has appeared in Police1, the IADLEST Standards & Training Director Magazine, the ILEETA Journal, and Law Enforcement Today, reaching tens of thousands of practitioners across North America. Sorted newest first.
Showing one publication. View all publications →
What POST Standards Should Require From an Interview Training Course
A model national floor for law enforcement interview training: the eight elements a modern course should require, from evidence-based, non-coercive methodology, the Cognitive Interview, and Strategic Use of Evidence to trauma-informed practice, procedural justice, scenario-based assessment, and qualified instructors, plus why an integrated framework matters more than a checklist.
The techniques are the directions. Recognition is the navigation.
What 1,500 search warrants taught me about writing an affidavit that survives challenge
How clear sourcing, complete context, disciplined scope, and a careful backward read strengthen a warrant before it ever reaches the courtroom. The recurring attack vectors behind most suppression and Franks-style challenges, and the drafting discipline that defeats them before a hearing.
The affidavit becomes the permanent investigative record. Every paragraph can be tested.
You don’t need a script: Rethinking police interview training
Why effective investigative interviews depend less on techniques commonly categorized as accusatorial (including the Reid Technique and programs derived from it) and more on adaptable, rapport-based, field-proven strategies officers can use when conversations turn unpredictable. The case for treating communication as a tactical skill, not a soft one.
Effective interviewing isn’t about the next line in the script. It’s about the next decision in the room.
Everything Comes Down to Communication
When things go wrong in law enforcement, whether during use-of-force incidents, failed investigations, or community interactions, after-action reviews often highlight training gaps, policy failures, or poor judgment.
Beneath these visible breakdowns often lies a quieter, pervasive issue: communication.
Teach to Talk®: Turning Communication Skills into Operational Tactics
Most instructors would agree that communication is critical. But in many law enforcement training programs, it’s still treated as a standalone skill, boxed into a few classroom hours and then forgotten in the field.
We must rethink how we teach communication, not as a soft skill but as a tactical one.
Beyond Words: Advanced Interview Skills for Law Enforcement
Whether conducting a traffic stop, interviewing a victim, witness, or suspect, or managing a volatile confrontation, an officer’s ability to connect, interpret, and respond effectively is critical for achieving safe and successful outcomes.
Communication is more than a necessary skill in law enforcement; it is a survival tool.
The Balance of Truth: Evaluating the Use of Polygraph Exams in Law-Enforcement Pre-Employment Screening
Polygraph exams measure physiological reactions to questions, aiming to gauge truthfulness. In the high-stakes environment of law enforcement, candidate screening is more than a procedural step.
It is vital to ensure that candidates possess the necessary skills and uphold the integrity and ethical standards required for the job.
Service version of this topic: Polygraph Unit Consulting: program assessment, methodology conversion (DLC), unit manual authorship, QC architecture, and examiner training for agencies running or building applicant and criminal polygraph programs.
Long-form analysis. Built for the work.
Original long-form insights published on the ASC site. Each one is a working reference, not a marketing essay. Topics span Title IX practice under current regulatory standards, trauma-informed interviewing technique, workplace investigation methodology, search warrant doctrine, and the deeper operational discipline behind every ASC training program. Filter by topic or sort by date.
The Affiant Biography: The Most Underused Section of a Search Warrant
The affidavit section that tells the court who is swearing to the facts and why they are qualified to interpret them. What a defensible biography must establish, the overstatement errors that invite a Franks or Alfinito challenge, and why you write it last. Includes a free fillable worksheet.
Why Statements Get Suppressed
The short list of reasons confessions and statements get thrown out: Miranda defects, involuntariness, custodial-interrogation missteps, the question-first two-step, and deception a statute now restricts. The doctrine behind each error, and the discipline that prevents them.
When Material Omissions Sink a Warrant: Lessons from the Trinidad, Texas Case
A teaching case study on the duty to disclose material facts in a search warrant affidavit. Drawn from the unfolding Trinidad, Texas case and the Franks doctrine: how omissions become a suppression problem, why affiant credibility is cumulative and now documented, and what the Backward Read is built to catch.
Title IX Investigative Interviewing in 2026: What Coordinators Need to Know
A practical guide to Title IX interviewing under the current regulatory landscape: interview-relevant requirements, common errors that create litigation exposure, trauma-informed practice, and the documentation standards that separate defensible findings from reversal on appeal.
How to Interview a Trauma-Exposed Victim Without Re-Traumatizing Them
An evidence-based guide to trauma-informed interviewing of victims: neurobiology of memory under stress, environmental setup, language choices, pacing, signs of dysregulation, grounding techniques, and when to pause. Drawn from Hopper’s research framework and the cognitive-interview tradition.
Why Most Workplace Investigations Get the Interview Wrong
Why most workplace investigations fail at the interview: leading questions, contamination, confirmation bias, the difference between rapport-based and adversarial questioning, and the documentation standards that hold up at EEOC, in arbitration, and at trial under Faragher, Ellerth, and Vance.
Search Warrants That Survive Challenge: Patterns from 1,500+ Filings
Drawn from 1,500-plus search warrants and court orders authored over a 24-year investigative career: affidavit structure, common suppression vulnerabilities, digital-evidence considerations after Carpenter, and the foundational case law (Katz, Gates, Franks, Kentucky v. King) that shapes every paragraph.
Get new insights in your inbox.
ASC publishes new insights on investigative interviewing, search warrant doctrine, Title IX practice, and other operational topics roughly monthly. Subscribe to receive new pieces directly when they publish, plus occasional notes from Joe on training topics.
Your email is on the list. Joe will send the next article when it publishes. If you ever want to stop receiving them, every email includes a one-click unsubscribe link.
For media, speaking, and conferences.
Joe accepts speaking engagements, podcast appearances, conference keynotes, and contributed articles in industry publications. Editors, producers, and conference organizers can use the press kit below or contact ASC directly.
Press Kit
Short and long bios, high-resolution headshots, brand assets, speaking topics, and the most recent publication list, packaged for editorial use.
Request Press Kit ›Speaking Inquiries
Conferences, keynotes, podcasts, and panel appearances. Joe speaks on investigative interviewing, search warrant doctrine, the Brandyn Foster homicide case study, and the methodology behind ASC. Booking topics, formats, and the full inquiry form live on the Speaking page.
Request Joe to Speak ›Contributed Articles
Industry publications can request original articles, expert commentary, or reprint permissions for existing pieces.
Request a Contributed Article ›Three more ways to engage.
The articles teach the doctrine. The training puts it to work. The Brandyn Foster case study shows it in action. Or schedule a direct conversation.
The failure is documented. 68 cases and counting where a confession, statement, or warrant was suppressed, each broken down by the investigative error that caused it. Browse the Suppression Database. Every one of them was preventable.