Home/Suppression Database
Investigator at a desk facing a case board with search-warrant doctrine notes: probable cause, nexus, particularity, totality of the circumstances, good faith exception
Interrogation room scene: detective conducting an interview, evidence on the table
Suppression Database

A national catalog of what got thrown out, and why.

The room is won or lost long before the motion is filed.

A free, searchable database of cases where confessions, statements, or warrant evidence were suppressed. Each entry breaks down the specific investigative error, the legal ground for suppression, and what a properly trained investigator should have done instead. Current through June 2026, from Mapp to the geofence cases now before the Supreme Court.

Free. Public. Current.

Miranda·Voluntariness·Franks & Warrant Defects·Scope & Particularity·Digital Search·Geofence Warrants

Cases Indexed
62 & growing
Jurisdictions
Federal & State
Categories
18 Grounds
Last Updated
Jun 2026
Get Case-Law Alerts
Why This Database Exists

Suppression hearings are teachable moments

When a confession gets suppressed, the case usually does too. When a warrant gets attacked at a Franks hearing and the affidavit collapses, every piece of evidence downstream of that warrant is in jeopardy.

The cases that produce those outcomes are written down. The opinions are public. The errors investigators made are documented in plain English by appellate judges. Almost nobody reads them.

This database fixes that. Every entry breaks down what the investigator did, why the court suppressed, and what the lesson is for the next investigator working a similar case. Free, public, and built to be sent around your detective bureau.

The case isn't lost in court. It's lost in the room. The opinion just makes it official.

Who this is for
  • Detectives & investigators who need to know what gets thrown out
  • Supervisors & lieutenants running roll-call training and bureau debriefs
  • Prosecutors who need to brief partner agencies on a recent suppression they have to live with
  • Defense attorneys who want a reference for cross-jurisdictional precedent
  • Academic & policy researchers tracking suppression-grounds frequency over time
  • Investigators preparing for testimony in a current suppression hearing of their own
Browse the Database

Search by category, jurisdiction, court level, or year

Every entry includes the case name, citation, factual summary, the legal ground for suppression, and the operational lesson. Joe is adding his own commentary to every case as the database expands.

Good law Limited by later case Overruled Superseded by later doctrine Pending higher-court review
Showing 62 of 62 cases · updated June 11, 2026 · scroll within grid to browse
Submit a Case →
Case-Law Alerts

Get the new cases before the next suppression motion

When new cases are added, an email with the rulings, a short note on the dominant trend Joe is seeing, and a forwardable summary you can use for roll call. No selling. Unsubscribe in one click.

What you'll get
  • New appellate suppression rulings, summarized as they are added
  • The trend Joe is watching (e.g. "courts are tightening on two-step Miranda")
  • A forwardable, single-page summary for your detective bureau
  • No sales emails. No list-sharing. Unsubscribe in one click.

If you already train your team off published suppression rulings, this is the easiest way to keep that pipeline fed.

Subscribe to Case-Law Alerts

Drop your work email below. You'll get the new cases as they are added, not on a fixed schedule.

You're in. Confirmation will hit your inbox shortly. You'll get the new cases as they are added.

Occasional case-law alerts, plus occasional ASC mailing-list updates. Unsubscribe any time. No list-sharing.

Categories of Suppression

The grounds investigators see in real cases

Brief, plain-language explanations of the doctrines that show up most often in suppression rulings. Use the filter above to pull cases tagged to each.

Miranda

Custody plus interrogation triggers the warnings requirement. Defective warnings, premature questioning, or invalid waiver puts the entire statement at risk.

Voluntariness

Even with proper Miranda, a statement obtained by physical, psychological, or coercive pressure can be suppressed as involuntary under the Due Process Clause.

Custodial Interrogation

The custody analysis turns on whether a reasonable person would feel free to leave. Misjudging custody is one of the most common pre-Miranda errors.

Franks & Warrant Defects

False statements or reckless omissions in a warrant affidavit can void the warrant and suppress all evidence. The defect is in the document, not the search.

Scope & Particularity

A warrant must describe with particularity what is to be seized. Overbroad warrants and overbroad executions both result in suppression.

Search Incident to Arrest

The exception is narrower than most officers think. A lawful arrest does not authorize an unbounded search of the arrestee's effects or vehicle.

Digital & Cell-Site Search

Phones, cell-site location, cloud data, and digital evidence require warrants under modern Fourth Amendment doctrine. Search-incident exceptions do not apply.

Two-Step Interrogation

Deliberately questioning without Miranda first to elicit an unwarned statement, then giving warnings and re-asking, produces suppression of both rounds.

Geofence & Keyword Warrants

Warrants that start with a whole population, every device in an area, or everyone who searched a term, and work backward to a suspect. Courts are split on whether they are unconstitutional general warrants, and the Supreme Court is deciding the question now.

Curtilage & the Home

The protected area immediately around a home, porch, driveway enclosure, yard, carries near-full Fourth Amendment protection. Stepping onto curtilage to investigate, including a dog sniff, can itself be a search.

Vehicle & Automobile Exception

Probable cause lets you search a vehicle without a warrant, but the exception does not let you enter a home's curtilage to reach a car, and it is narrower than the search-incident-to-arrest rule officers often confuse it with.

Exigent Circumstances

A true emergency, imminent escape, destruction of evidence, or danger to life, can justify a warrantless entry. Hot pursuit of a misdemeanant and community caretaking do not automatically qualify, especially at the home.

DUI & Chemical Testing

Breath tests are generally allowed incident to a DUI arrest; blood tests usually need a warrant. The natural dissipation of alcohol is not, by itself, an emergency that excuses the warrant.

Consent Search

Consent must be voluntary under the totality of the circumstances, and a present, objecting co-occupant can defeat it. Misrepresented authority or a pretextual removal of the objector invalidates the search.

Stop & Frisk

An investigative stop needs specific, articulable reasonable suspicion, and a frisk needs a separate basis to believe the person is armed. A stop cannot be prolonged for an unrelated investigation without new suspicion.

Exclusionary Rule

Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment, and evidence derived from it, is generally suppressed. Good-faith reliance, attenuation, independent source, and inevitable discovery are the main ways evidence still comes in.

Train to Prevent It

The cases above didn't have to happen. The next ones don't either.

Every suppression in this database was preventable. The same investigator, trained on the right framework, gets a different outcome. These are the ASC courses that target the specific errors documented above.

Submit a Case

See a ruling we should add? Send it in.

The database is national in scope. State supreme courts, state appellate divisions, federal districts, and circuit rulings are all in play. If you've got a published opinion that demonstrates a clear suppression error worth teaching from, we want to see it.

What we add
  • Published appellate and supreme-court opinions where evidence or statements were suppressed
  • Cases with a clear, identifiable investigative error worth teaching from
  • Opinions in plain English (sealed, redacted, or unpublished rulings cannot be added)
What we don't add

Active matters with open investigative steps, sealed proceedings, juvenile cases without anonymization, or matters where adding the case could create officer safety or victim safety concerns.

Submit a Case

Joe personally reviews every submission. Strong submissions are added with attribution to the submitter, where consented.

Thank you. Your submission has been sent to Joe directly. He reviews every submission personally.

Your email is added to the ASC mailing list for occasional updates. Unsubscribe any time. No third-party sharing.

Database FAQ

The questions users actually ask

Have one we haven't covered? Send it through the contact form. Joe answers personally.

Subscribe to Alerts Submit a Case

Is this database free to use?

Yes. Free, public, no login required. Subscribing to case-law alerts requires an email. Submitting a case requires contact information. Everything else is open.

How are cases chosen?

A case is added when (1) it is published, (2) it documents a clear investigative error that produced the suppression, and (3) the lesson it teaches is generalizable to other investigators. Case selection is editorial. Joe personally reviews every entry.

Is the commentary legal advice?

No. The database is educational. Entries summarize published opinions and offer operational lessons for investigators. Nothing here is a substitute for advice from your agency counsel, your prosecutor partner, or licensed counsel of your own.

Can I cite an entry in a brief?

Cite the underlying opinion, not the database summary. Each entry includes the citation and a link to the opinion where available. Use this database to find cases, not to characterize their holdings in a court filing.

How often is the database updated?

It is expanded in waves as significant rulings come down, drawn from published Supreme Court and appellate decisions plus selected federal district and state rulings of broad teaching value. The most recent major update was June 2026. Subscribe to case-law alerts to be notified when new cases are added.

Why does ASC publish this?

ASC trains investigators in the techniques that prevent the outcomes catalogued here. The database is a service to the field, a teaching tool, and an honest acknowledgment that the legal landscape investigators work in is documented, public, and very much worth studying.

Can the database be embedded or syndicated?

Reach out. Agency-internal use, training-library inclusion, and academic syndication are all options. Commercial republication requires written agreement.

Real opinions·Real errors·Real lessons·Free to use·Current through 2026

Want the cases delivered to your inbox?

One email a month. New cases, the trend Joe is watching, a forwardable summary for your bureau.