
The polygraph-examination deployment of the Teach to Talk® methodology and the Adaptive Strategies Compass™. Built for the pre-test and post-test interviews that determine the value of the examination.
The most valuable part of a polygraph examination is not the instrument. It is the interview. Built for examiners who want to strengthen the most important component of the examination process: human communication.
This is an additive course for already-certified examiners. Not a polygraph certification path.
Rapport·Behavior·Strategy·Disclosure
Built by the architect of the NYS Police Polygraph Unit's Directed Lie pre-employment program.
Pre-test Rapport·Behavioral Observation·Adaptive Communication·Strategic Interviewing·Teach to Talk®
Physiological data is investigative insight. The quality of the information obtained before, during, and after the examination is driven by the examiner’s ability to build rapport, establish credibility, recognize behavioral changes, manage resistance, and conduct purposeful investigative interviews.
Research and real-world investigative experience consistently demonstrate that meaningful disclosures, clarifications, admissions, and case-critical information are most often developed through skilled interviewing, not through confrontation, scripts, or overreliance on instrumentation alone.
This course focuses on the strategic communication skills that separate technically competent examiners from truly effective investigative interviewers.
Build real connection with the examinee while maintaining professionalism and the control the examination requires.
Conduct pre-test conversations that improve cooperation, engagement, and information quality before a single chart is run.
Recognize the deviations that indicate stress, emotional significance, cognitive load, avoidance, or increasing trust.
Shift communication style based on the examinee’s personality, demeanor, and behavioral presentation as the interview unfolds.
Lower defensiveness and reactance without sacrificing investigative effectiveness or the integrity of the examination.
Post-test conversations designed to encourage clarification, disclosure, and truthful conversation. Not confession-at-any-cost.
Recognize the common, often unintentional missteps that increase resistance or contaminate the information being gathered.
Strengthen examiner confidence, presence, and credibility, the qualities the room reads before any question is asked.
Weave behavioral observation and strategic interviewing into every phase of the examination from greeting to closeout.
Unlike outdated approaches that rely on intimidation, accusation, or simplistic interpretations of body language, this program emphasizes a modern, research-supported approach to investigative interviewing. The empirical base (Meissner et al.'s meta-analysis of information-gathering vs. accusatorial methods, FBI HIG research on rapport-based interrogation, and the UK PEACE model) converges on the same finding: non-confrontational technique produces more reliable post-test disclosures, fewer false positives, and statements that survive admissibility challenge.
Participants learn that deception is most reliably identified through inconsistencies in facts, statements, evidence, and behavioral context, not through isolated gestures or “tells.”
Nonverbal behavior matters because deviations from a person’s baseline can indicate stress, cognitive load, emotional significance, discomfort, avoidance, or developing trust. The behavioral shift is information. Whether it indicates deception is a question answered by the facts and the evidence, not by the shift itself.
How cooperation forms, why it accelerates disclosure, and how to engineer it on purpose.
How the examiner’s tone, pacing, and presence shape what the examinee feels safe to share.
Establishing the neutral signature early so meaningful deviations actually register later.
How to stay regulated, intentional, and calibrated when the room is at its hardest.
Active, signal-aware listening that catches what the words do not carry alone.
Question design that elicits information without contaminating it.
Building credibility and connection in high-stakes interactions where the clock is short.
The relationship between safety, disclosure, and the quality of every answer that follows.
The instrument records data. The interview produces information. The Adaptive Strategies Compass™ gives the examiner a complete operating system for the conversation around the chart, calibrated for the unique pressures of pre-test rapport, in-examination consistency, and post-test disclosure.
Strategic, non-confrontational dialogue applied across every phase of the examination. The conversational discipline that makes voluntary disclosure the natural outcome of the post-test interview.
A six-stage investigative thinking framework (Assess, Collect, Collate, Evaluate, Survey, Summarize) applied to the full arc of the examination from initial referral through final disposition.
Behavioral style reading in the pre-test interview. Knowing how the examinee processes pressure before the first chart is run is the single highest-leverage adjustment an examiner can make.
The most research-validated technique for improving recall accuracy, applied to pre-test memory elicitation and post-test clarification. Context reinstatement and varied retrieval that surface information the standard pre-test interview routinely misses.
Pre-examination planning that anticipates where the examinee is likely to resist, where the post-test conversation will branch, and how the examiner navigates from chart result to truthful account.
Five lenses (Rationalize, Project, Minimize, Socialize, Emphasize the Truth) for understanding why an examinee is behaving the way they are at each phase of the examination process.
The disciplined disclosure of physiological findings during the post-test interview. Timing and sequencing of chart-based evidence to encourage truthful clarification rather than reactive denial.
Challenge-and-clarify questioning that resolves the discrepancy between physiological data and verbal account. The technique that turns an inconclusive examination into an admissible statement.
Every direction of this Compass deploys somewhere in the examination process. Examiners leave this course with the complete framework, calibrated for the pre-test, examination, and post-test work that determines whether the examination becomes evidence.

Joseph R. Auriemma, Jr. is a Certified Polygraph Examiner who led the New York State Police Polygraph Unit's pre-employment program during a period when the unit conducted over 1,200 applicant polygraph examinations per year, in addition to its criminal examination caseload. He converted the unit's pre-employment program to the Directed Lie Comparison Test methodology and personally authored the unit's new examination manual, operating policy, and quality control system, the documentation framework that defined how every applicant examination was conducted, reviewed, and admitted into the agency's hiring decisions.
The program reform was undertaken at a time when the Directed Lie methodology represented a significant departure from older comparison-question approaches. The decision required not only methodological competence but the operational discipline to build the quality control architecture that would protect every examination from challenge. The manual, policy, and QC system Joe authored became the unit's operating standard. Joe also served as a Regional Coordinator overseeing 39 examiners and completed 24 years of broader law enforcement service with the New York State Police, including six and a half years in the Major Crimes Unit. That investigative discipline, applied to interview work across thousands of cases, informs every component of this course.
Certifications: Certified Polygraph Examiner · IADLEST National Certified Instructor (INCI) · Certified Forensic Interviewer (CFI)
The instrument does not produce the admission. The examiner does. The pre-test conversation that builds enough trust for disclosure, the in-examination presence that keeps the room calibrated, and the post-test interview that turns physiological findings into a voluntary truthful account, that is where the examination becomes evidence.
Contact ASC to bring this training to your polygraph unit and equip your examiners for the conversations that determine what every chart actually means.
Free field resources available at the Resource Library, including downloadable interview frameworks and field guides.
Polygraph Examiner Interview Training is an additive course built on the same foundation as the rest of the ASC catalog. Examiners who want the broader investigative interviewing system internalized at the same level as their polygraph methodology should look at From Information to Evidence and The Academy. Examiners who want behavioral observation as a dedicated discipline, particularly applicable to the pre-test interview, should look at Beyond Words. Examiners whose post-test interviews touch trauma or victim contexts should look at Trauma-Informed Interviewing.
The course is delivered in a two-to-three-day format on-site at your agency. The two-day version covers the complete pre-test and post-test interview curriculum; the three-day version adds extended scenario work and more individual coaching. Both are designed for examiners already certified in polygraph methodology.
This course is built for certified polygraph examiners, law enforcement, federal, and credentialed private-sector examiners, who want to elevate the interview portions of the examination. It is not a polygraph certification course; it presumes existing examiner credentials and focuses on the pre-test and post-test interview skills that determine examination outcomes.
Traditional polygraph training focuses on instrumentation, question construction, and chart analysis. This course addresses the interview skill set that surrounds the chart, pre-test rapport and disclosure, post-test interviewing that extends beyond physiological data, and credibility assessment that integrates behavioral observation with examination results. The skills directly affect examination accuracy and admission rates.
Structuring pre-test interviews for maximum voluntary disclosure, non-confrontational post-test interview strategies that extend beyond physiological data, credibility assessment frameworks that go beyond the polygraph result, reducing false positives through better pre-exam questioning, rapport-building strategies tailored to the examination context, and documentation practices that protect the integrity of the examination.
Older confrontational, accusatory interrogation methods are widely associated with examiner confrontation that can compromise both the chart and the resulting statement. ASC teaches a non-confrontational, evidence-based alternative: strategic disclosure, rapport-based questioning, and Strategic Use of Evidence, that produces more reliable physiological data, fewer false positives, and statements that hold up under court challenge.
Joseph R. Auriemma, Jr. is a Certified Polygraph Examiner who led the New York State Police Polygraph Unit's pre-employment program during a period when the unit conducted over 1,200 applicant examinations annually, in addition to its criminal caseload. He converted the unit's pre-employment program to the Directed Lie Comparison Test methodology and personally authored the unit's reformed examination manual, operating policy, and quality control system. He served as a Regional Coordinator overseeing 39 examiners during his 24 years with the New York State Police, including 6.5 years in the Major Crimes Unit. He holds the IADLEST National Certified Instructor (INCI) and Certified Forensic Interviewer (CFI) credentials and has trained 6,500+ professionals.
Yes. The entire methodology is built on non-confrontational, evidence-based interviewing. The goal of the post-test interview is accurate, complete, court-defensible information, not a confession at any cost. Examiners trained in this framework report better disclosure rates, fewer false positives, and post-test statements that survive cross-examination and admissibility challenges.
The course is delivered on-site at your agency or examiner association. Contact ASC through the Request Training form or by calling (914) 489-2330 to discuss scheduling, examiner count, and case-type emphasis. Joe responds personally and tailors the curriculum to the examination categories your unit handles most often.
Published rates for every ASC course, including Polygraph Examiner Interview Training, are listed on the pricing page. Final pricing depends on format (two-day vs. three-day delivery), examiner count, and scope of curriculum customization. Joe responds personally and structures pricing based on the unit's examination categories and operational priorities.
Yes, particularly for examiners who rotate between examination types or who have extended gaps between high-stakes cases. ASC offers refresher options ranging from one-day intensives focused on a single Compass direction (typically pre-test rapport engineering or Strategic Use of Evidence in the post-test interview) to two-day clinics for units that want to lock in the discipline across personnel changes. Contact ASC to discuss refresher scheduling.
This course trains individual examiners. For agencies that need program-level work, ASC offers a separate Polygraph Unit Consulting service: program assessment, methodology conversion (Directed Lie Comparison deployment), unit manual authorship, quality control architecture, and the examiner training that locks the reform in. Anchored in the NYSP Polygraph Unit's reformed pre-employment program (1,200+ applicant exams per year).
Joe, you were a great instructor. We learned a lot from you and will take on some of what we learned. I would highly recommend you to anyone interested.
Salvatore SalernoNY State Justice Center
Host this course as an open-enrollment offering: you provide the room and help fill the seats with regional attendees, and ASC handles registration, payment, instructor travel, and POST filing. In return, your agency earns complimentary seats for its own people.
A training space, and a hand getting the word out to neighboring agencies. That is the host's part.
Registration, payment processing, instructor travel and lodging, materials, and POST credit filing.
One complimentary seat for every 10 paid registrations: 1 at 10, 2 at 20, 3 at 30. Train your own people at no cost.
Request the complete module-by-module syllabus and a sample day-by-day agenda for this course, sent to you personally by Joe. It is the document to forward to your command, training office, or budget approver, the thing that turns "this looks good" into an approved request.
Request information or schedule a strategy call to discuss your organization's needs.