
Investigative Interviewing Training
The flagship deployment of the Teach to Talk® philosophy and the Adaptive Strategies Compass™. Two decades of investigative practice built into a complete methodology for turning conversation into court-ready evidence.
A methodology, not a technique. A framework, not a script.
Built from 24+ years of investigative experience·Designed for investigators·Focused on results
Every investigation produces information. Leads, tips, observations, records, raw material that points in directions but doesn't close cases. What converts information into evidence is the interview. Specifically, the quality of it.
Detectives who conduct thorough, methodologically sound interviews don't just gather more, they gather better. More accurate. More complete. More detailed. The kind of account that survives cross-examination, corroborates physical evidence, and holds up when a defense attorney spends six months looking for the seam.
Built for every role that conducts investigative interviews, across every category of case. The framework adapts to your case environment. The methodology stays the same.













This is not a lecture series. It's a hands-on investigative interviewing system built for real-world cases.
You will work through victim, witness, and suspect scenarios while applying the Teach to Talk® methodology with direct instructor feedback throughout the course.
A structured system you can immediately apply in the field, from first contact through disclosure and documentation
Observe meaningful changes in behavior, communication style, emotional regulation, and cognitive load over the course of a conversation, to better navigate interviews, build rapport, and manage resistance strategically
Understand how memory encoding, storage, and retrieval affect recall, statement reliability, and question design
Capture critical details without interrupting rapport, disclosure flow, or subject engagement
Practice interviewing victims, witnesses, and suspects in realistic exercises designed to build confidence, adaptability, and control
Investigators looking for:
This course is built for people who want legally sound, strategically disciplined, evidence-focused interviewing methodology deployable in real investigations.
Most interview training teaches techniques. From Information to Evidence teaches the complete framework, every direction of the Adaptive Strategies Compass™, in the only course that delivers all eight.
The foundational philosophy. Purposeful, human-centered dialogue grounded in empathy, rapport, and strategic intent.
A six-stage investigative framework (Assess, Collect, Collate, Evaluate, Survey, Summarize) for moving from initial information to strategic resolution.
Reading behavioral style to adapt communication, reduce stylistic friction, and let the substance of the interview drive the outcome.
The most research-validated technique for improving the accuracy and completeness of recall from victims and witnesses.
Conversation planning that anticipates resistance, branches with the subject, and keeps strategic direction when the interview turns.
Five lenses (Rationalize, Project, Minimize, Socialize, Emphasize the Truth) for understanding the drivers behind a subject's behavior.
Timing the disclosure of evidence for diagnostic impact and credibility assessment, never as a confrontation reflex.
Challenge-and-clarify questioning that creates evidence-based cognitive pressure, encouraging clarification, not confrontation.
Every module in this course activates one or more of these directions. Investigators leave with a navigation system they can deploy in any interview environment, with any subject type, in any category of case.
Explore the Adaptive Strategies Compass™ →The complete curriculum delivered as a focused intensive. Victim, witness, and suspect interviews. All eight Compass directions covered. Ideal for agencies training a unit or shift together with a tight operational calendar.
Same curriculum, with extended individual scenario time and deeper coverage of the Enhanced Cognitive Interview, the area where technique most directly translates to evidentiary quality.
Looking for the full immersion? The Academy delivers this same course over five days, with a significant expansion of group and individual hands-on exercises and extended scenario practice under real-time instructor feedback.
Learn more about The Academy →Not because investigators lack commitment. Because critical information is lost through:
The result is often partial disclosure, fragile statements, missed corroboration opportunities, and accounts that weaken under scrutiny.
This course was built to correct those failures systematically.
Better interviews do not just produce more conversation. They produce better cases, the kind that hold up at every downstream step:
Participants work through scenario-based interviews involving:
Investigative interviews are influenced long before the first question is asked.
Subjects assess threat, safety, authority, and psychological pressure continuously. Investigators learn how environmental factors affect disclosure, resistance, defensiveness, and memory retrieval, and how to intentionally structure interviews to improve communication quality.
Script-driven
Adaptive framework-driven
Confession-focused
Information and evidentiary quality focused
Technique memorization
Decision-making methodology
One-style interviewing
Subject-specific adaptation
Reactive evidence use
Strategic evidence deployment
Generic rapport concepts
Structured rapport methodology
Myth-based “lie detection” assumptions
Grounded in evidence-based practices
Human behavior is complex and contextual. This course does not teach participants to determine truthfulness through body language, but rather how to observe behavioral changes strategically to improve communication, rapport, and conversational navigation.
The complete legal framework governing investigative interviews, constitutional requirements, admissibility standards, and procedural safeguards. The boundaries that determine whether anything obtained in an interview survives a motion to suppress.
The cognitive framework for organizing information and making disciplined decisions about how evidence is developed, tested, and used. Investigators leave with a way to think about cases, not just techniques to apply to them.
How memory works, why accounts change over time, what interviewer behaviors contaminate information, and what conditions consistently produce accurate and complete disclosure. Everything else in the course is built on this foundation.
Rapport is the single most reliable predictor of interview quality. The Teach to Talk® methodology moves interviews away from scripted question lists and toward adaptive, strategically directed conversations that guide subjects from guarded responses to full narrative accounts.
A documentation discipline that captures critical detail without breaking the interview thread, rapport, or disclosure flow. Field notes that translate cleanly into accurate, court-defensible written statements.
Rapid identification of behavioral tendencies and the establishment of reliable individual baselines. Without a baseline, no behavior is “deviant”, and every behavioral judgment built on a missing baseline is unreliable.
Reading the verbal, behavioral, and physiological deviations that indicate where deeper inquiry is needed. What changes mean, what they don’t mean, and how to follow them without leading the subject.
Observation of behavioral cues in context, posture, tone, pace, movement, and emotional regulation, used to understand stress, rapport, resistance, comfort, and engagement during conversation. Behavior helps explain how someone is experiencing the conversation, not whether they are being truthful.
Trauma affects memory, disclosure is non-linear, and the interviewer’s approach directly shapes what surfaces. Trauma-informed technique, managing emotional dysregulation, and supporting complete disclosure without re-traumatization.
Memory contamination mechanisms, the role of suggestion and post-event information, and the techniques that produce the most accurate and complete witness accounts. Securing the account before outside influence takes hold.
Approach strategy, baseline establishment, managing denial and minimization, recognizing resistance and evasion patterns, and moving a resistant subject toward disclosure. All within a framework that is legally sound, ethically grounded, and tactically effective.
The most research-validated technique for improving recall accuracy. Context reinstatement, varied retrieval, reverse-order recall, and change of perspective, deployed across victim, witness, and applicable suspect contexts.
How and when evidence is revealed is as tactically important as the evidence itself. Testing account credibility, surfacing inconsistencies, and creating conditions for disclosure without prematurely revealing what you know.
Precise intervention for inconsistencies without crossing into coercion. Disciplined use of confrontation that surfaces truth instead of producing the appearance of it.
The psychology and warning signs of false confessions, the interview conditions that produce them, and how to recognize the pull toward those conditions in your own technique. Recognizing the risk is the first defense against creating it.
Working with hostile, evasive, or emotionally escalated subjects without losing interview control or legal integrity. De-escalation that protects the interview, the case, and the integrity of any later prosecution.
The course is offered in two formats: a two-day intensive covering the complete curriculum across victim, witness, and suspect interviews, and a three-day version that adds extended individual scenario time and deeper coverage of the Enhanced Cognitive Interview. Both are delivered on-site at your agency.
Detectives and criminal investigators across all crime categories, special victims investigators who need trauma-informed technique, task force and multi-jurisdictional investigators, and supervisors who direct and evaluate investigator work. The framework works for all experience levels, newer investigators build it from scratch, while veterans refine technique against current research.
The course is built around the Teach to Talk® methodology, adaptive, strategically directed conversation rather than rigid scripts. It integrates the Enhanced Cognitive Interview (the most research-validated technique for improving recall accuracy), Strategic Use of Evidence (SUE), trauma-informed practice, and behavioral baseline assessment. Every technique is grounded in peer-reviewed research, not popular mythology.
Yes. A full module covers victim interviewing with trauma-informed technique, how trauma affects memory, why disclosure is non-linear, how to manage emotional dysregulation, and how to support complete disclosure without re-traumatization. Special victims investigators frequently attend specifically for the trauma-informed components.
Yes. The Challenge & Clarify module addresses the psychology and warning signs of false confessions, alongside how to address inconsistencies precisely without crossing into coercion. Recognizing the interview conditions that produce false confessions is essential to building a case that holds up to court challenge.
ASC's framework is a non-confrontational, evidence-based alternative to older confrontational, accusatory interrogation methods. It is built on cognitive psychology, the Enhanced Cognitive Interview, rapport-based disclosure, and Strategic Use of Evidence, and the goal is accurate, complete, court-defensible information, not a confession at any cost. Older confrontational, accusatory interrogation methods have drawn substantial criticism in the academic literature and in published court rulings for elevated false-confession risk.
Joseph R. Auriemma, Jr. served 24 years with the New York State Police, including 6.5 years in the Major Crimes Unit, and retired at the rank of Senior Investigator. He has conducted thousands of interviews and interrogations, holds the IADLEST National Certified Instructor (INCI) and Certified Forensic Interviewer (CFI) credentials, has trained 6,500+ professionals, and developed the Teach to Talk® and Adaptive Strategies Compass™ frameworks that anchor ASC's curriculum.
ASC files for state POST, MPTC, MCOLES, TCOLE, CLEET, or equivalent training commission credit hours in every host state. The specific credit hour count depends on course length and the host state's standards. The instructor holds the IADLEST National Certified Instructor (INCI) designation, and ASC can provide documentation that supports reciprocal credit submission for attendees from non-host states. Contact ASC during scheduling to confirm credit availability for your jurisdiction.
The course is delivered on-site at your agency. Contact ASC through the Request Training form or by calling (914) 489-2330 to discuss scheduling, enrollment, and case-type focus. Joe responds personally and tailors curriculum emphasis to the categories of cases your investigators handle most frequently.

Joseph R. Auriemma, Jr. served 24 years with the New York State Police, including 6.5 years in the Major Crimes Unit. He retired as a Senior Investigator supervising 5 investigators and 29 uniformed troopers. His career spanned thousands of interviews across the full spectrum, homicide, major narcotics, multi-jurisdictional cases, and every subject type from cooperative witnesses to seasoned criminal subjects.
During the investigation of the Brandyn Foster homicide, Joe worked with the Federal Bureau of Investigation and, through FBI-facilitated coordination, spoke directly with engineering personnel at Google. That conversation revealed that certain deleted-user-data records existed within Google systems but were not being produced in response to lawful process. Those investigative findings directly contributed to changes in how Google documented deleted-data responses and to the development of what became known as the Google Tombstone Report, a record identifying data that once existed on Google systems but had since been deleted or rendered unavailable.
That same investigative discipline is the foundation of every course he teaches. From Information to Evidence is built on the lessons that case demanded, the moments where the interview was the only thing that moved the case forward.
Certifications: IADLEST National Certified Instructor (INCI) · Certified Forensic Interviewer (CFI) · Certified Polygraph Examiner
There was an overwhelmingly positive response from the Investigators and Officers in attendance, and I thought it was an extremely valuable training. We were long overdue for it here. It was good to get everyone on the same page, and it was interesting to watch the investigators use the techniques in real cases, note-taking, participatory Miranda, rapport-building, and several others. One of our Investigators did such a good job on a recent interview that I gathered the whole office, and we watched it as a group. The two-day format was ideal for us. You were the right person to deliver the right message.
Lieutenant Daniel J. Belles · Colonie Police Department
This course is built for that moment. When investigative interviews improve, every part of the case improves with them, stronger probable cause, stronger corroboration, stronger prosecutions, fewer dead ends, and statements that survive every challenge that comes after.
Contact ASC to schedule training customized to your agency, investigative responsibilities, and case environment.
Available in two-day and three-day formats. Joe responds to every inquiry personally and tailors curriculum emphasis to the case categories your investigators handle most.
Phone: (914) 489-2330