Master evidence-based methods to conduct fair, trauma-informed interviews that enhance credibility and protect all parties involved.
Research consistently shows that trauma affects memory, disclosure, and behavior in ways that are often misread by investigators. This course teaches professionals to recognize the signs of trauma, create conditions that support disclosure, and conduct interviews that produce reliable, uncontaminated accounts, while protecting victims from secondary harm.

Joseph R. Auriemma, Jr. (INCI, CFI), 24+ years law enforcement experience, former NY State Police Academy primary interviewing trainer, and nationally recognized expert in evidence-based investigative communication.
Full BioThe course is offered in one-day or two-day formats. Both deliver the core curriculum, how trauma affects memory and disclosure, creating safe interview environments, avoiding re-traumatization, and producing credible victim accounts. The two-day format adds extended scenario practice and case-specific applications.
All levels of law enforcement, patrol, detectives, special victims investigators, supervisors. The course is especially valuable for officers who interview crime victims regularly, including domestic violence, sexual assault, child abuse, and elder abuse cases. No prior trauma-informed training is required.
Trauma-informed interviewing recognizes that trauma physiologically affects how victims encode, store, and retrieve memory. Trauma-exposed victims may disclose non-linearly, omit key details, recall events out of sequence, and present what looks like inconsistency. Trauma-informed practice creates the conditions and uses the techniques that produce accurate, complete accounts despite these effects.
Trauma can fragment memory, delay disclosure, produce non-linear accounts, and create gaps that fill in over multiple interviews. These are documented neurobiological effects, not signs of fabrication. Investigators trained to recognize trauma responses interpret victim statements correctly and avoid mistakenly treating trauma symptoms as deception indicators.
No. Research consistently shows that inconsistency in trauma-exposed victims is often a trauma response, not a deception indicator. Treating trauma symptoms as deception is one of the most common interviewer errors and frequently undermines otherwise viable cases. The course teaches officers to distinguish between the two.
The course covers environmental setup, language choices, pacing, and interventions that minimize re-traumatization risk. Officers learn to recognize signs of dysregulation in real time, slow or pause appropriately, and provide grounding without compromising evidentiary integrity. The result: more complete disclosure, better cases, and lower secondary-harm risk.
Yes, the course is grounded in current trauma-informed best practices and meets the trauma-informed standards required by many state, federal, and grant-funded programs. For specific compliance questions related to your jurisdiction or grant requirements, contact ASC and we’ll confirm fit before scheduling.
The course is delivered on-site at your agency in one-day or two-day format. Contact ASC through the Request Training form or by calling (914) 489-2330 to discuss scheduling, format choice, and case-type focus areas.
Request information or schedule a strategy call to discuss your organization's needs.